The following is a critique that I received from my Thesis instructor. I almost cried I was so happy.
So, Stephanie, I am sure that you must have been told that you are a fantastic writer. Ths is pretty amazing work. My main critique of it is not predicated on your phrasing, grammar or depth: It is purelya problem with degree of dirrect design examples. This desparately needs visual examples to displace some of this. If visual humor is as close to linguistic as you say then let's please see it. This whole paper is a bit weird for me in that we have barely spoken and here it is fully formed from the head of Zeus, but a good paper is a good paper. Please change the means of citation, insert your visual examples of at least four of your variant descriptions of humour and submit for editing. I am sure that folks would go through this extra quick. It is really well written.
Wednesday, November 21, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
wow, that's great! sounds like a good teacher too!
Post a Comment